California Municipal Law Blog
by Derek P. Cole on March 2, 2015
posted in
Contracts, Mayors,
The lawsuit had it all. There were claims of conflicts of interest and a corrupt bargain. Millions of dollars hinged on its outcome. The suit resulted in the recall of elected officials. And while claiming it was aimed toward restoring good government, the suit was funded by business competitors that had much to gain.
In the end, the case was decided not by these salacious facts, but by a technical issue of statutory interpretation: When is a mayor “absent” under the California Government Code?
In Torres v. City of Montebello, a California appellate court held that a mayor is “absent” ... Continue Reading
tags:
Contracts, Montebello, Official Duties, Recalls, Solid Waste Franchise,
by Derek P. Cole on February 23, 2015
posted in
Administrative Regulations, Ethics,
The Fair Political Practices Commission (“FPPC”) has recently adopted a new regulation governing when public officials have conflicts of interests in businesses they own or for which they are investors. The amended regulation, which became effect in January 2015, is part of a broader FPPC program to streamline and simplify the regulations that implement the Political Reform Act of 1974, California’s principal law governing the ethics of public officials. The recent amendment concerning business-based conflicts follows changes the FPPC made in 2014 to the regulation governing conflicts for ... Continue Reading
tags:
Business Interests, conflicts of interest, Regulations,
by William R. Galstan on February 12, 2015
posted in
Zoning,
It’s common knowledge that an elected official who has an economic interest in a matter coming before the agency cannot participate in the decision. But how about an official who has such strong feelings about the application that it seems his or her mind was made up prior to the hearing?
In a recent case, Woody’s Group v. City of Newport Beach, the state Court of Appeal underscored existing law by stating that officials must at least give the impression that they are open-minded about the outcome of applications coming before them.
A restaurant and bar had filed an application with the ... Continue Reading
tags:
Appeals, Bias, Due Process,
by William R. Galstan on February 4, 2015
posted in
Propositions 13/26/218, Public Utilities,
Under a court ruling issued in January of this year, cities must be careful when transferring money from utility accounts into the general fund.
The City of Redding owns an electrical utility. Because it is publicly owned, it is exempt from the one percent ad valorem tax imposed on privately-owned California utilities. The City requires the utility department to pay the city’s general fund a one percent “Payment In Lieu Of Taxes,” or “PILOT” fee, for the city’s general use.
In Citizens for Fair REU Rates v. City of Redding, the state Court of Appeal held that the PILOT ... Continue Reading
tags:
General Fund, PILOT Fee, Proposition 26,
by Derek P. Cole on February 1, 2015
posted in
Emergency Medical Services,
The Attorney General has recently issued an opinion covering questions that counties and cities have expressed concerning “Section 201” of the Emergency Medical Services (“EMS”) Act. The opinion addresses some ambiguities in the administration of Health & Safety Code section 1797.201 (known as “Section 201”) concerning “grandfathered” city and fire-district EMS providers.
... Continue Reading
tags:
EMS Act, Grandfathered EMS Providers, Local EMS Agencies, Section 201,
